Phrurolithidae Banks, 1892

Family |   ACCEPTED
N.B.: elevated to family status and relimited by Ramírez, 2014: 342; the family is not monophyletic per Kulkarni, Wood & Hormiga, 2023: 521, f. 19.
Gen. Corealithus Kamura, 2021 urn:lsid:nmbe.ch:spidergen:04767

In synonymy:

Corealithus subnigerus (Fu, Chen & Zhang, 2016) = Corealithus nigerus Yin, 2012 (Mu & Zhang, 2023b: 21)

Corealithus coreanus (Paik, 1991) | | Korea, Russia (Kurile Is.), Japan urn:lsid:nmbe.ch:spidersp:024302
Phrurolithus coreanus Ikeda, 1991: 17, f. 1-8 (f, Dm)
Phrurolithus coreanus Paik, 1991a: 174, f. 1-9 (Df) Original description
Phrurolithus coreanus Saito, 1992c: 952, f. 4-5 (m)
Phrurolithus coreanus Kim & Choi, 2001: 84, f. 31-39 (f)
Phrurolithus coreanus Namkung, 2002: 416, f. 33.5a-b (mf)
Phrurolithus coreanus Namkung, 2003: 454, f. 35.5a-b (mf)
Phrurolithus coreanus Kamura, 2009: 553, f. 38-41 (mf)
Phrurolithus coreanus Kim & Lee, 2014: 45, f. 31A-D (mf)
Phrurolithus coreanus Baba, 2015: 23, f. 2-3 (f)
Otacilia coreana Zamani & Marusik, 2020b: 312 (T from Phrurolithus)
Corealithus coreanus Kamura, 2021b: 126, f. 8A-G, 9A-G (mf, T from Otacilia)
Corealithus nigerus (Yin, 2012) | | China urn:lsid:nmbe.ch:spidersp:046208
Phrurolithus nigerus Yin in Yin et al., 2012: 1077, f. 565a-c (Df; interpreted as noun in apposition, the correct Latin adjective would be niger) Original description
Phrurolithus subnigerus Fu, Chen & Zhang, 2016: 287, f. 13A-G, 14A-E (Dmf; noun in apposition, the correct Latin adjective would be subniger) [urn:lsid:nmbe.ch:spidersp:048712]
Otacilia nigera Zamani & Marusik, 2020b: 312 (T from Phrurolithus)
Otacilia subnigera Zamani & Marusik, 2020b: 312 (T from Phrurolithus)
Corealithus subnigerus Kamura, 2021b: 127 (T from Otacilia)
Corealithus nigerus Mu & Zhang, 2023b: 21 (T from Otacilia, S of Corealithus subnigerus)

Sponsors